This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC) 
5x expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 20:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC).
This is what DYK should do: You ask did I know that there were mosses and volcanic activity in the Antarctic, and I reply genuinely, "Nope, didn't know that ... interesting." Anyways, the article meets newness and size requirements with > 5x expansion from 9/22 to 9/29. Article is also well written and makes appropriate use of citations. Earwig (here) indicated some potential (46.5%) of copyvio, but it doesn't look problematic to me, mostly just long citations and scientific nomenclature stuff. The hook is interesting, short enough, neutral, and supported by in-line citations. Just needs the QPQ. Cbl62 (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I couldn't figure out what to do with this statement: "and thus renewed eruptions would likely not impact any human habitations, regional environmental or even global climate impacts are possible." Does it mean that regional and global impacts are possibly even though human habitation impacts aren't, or that they also are not? -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
@JHunterJ:It means that there is no local population that could be impacted, but large eruptions may instead hit globally. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)